worst multi-use vehicle

"The Resistance needs you..."
User avatar
Edward Fox
Slime Lord
Slime Lord
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 7:40 pm
Location: Anacortes, Washington

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by Edward Fox » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:55 pm

Well, fireflies work well as chaff or a distraction.

(Not that I use them often.)
]http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd33 ... nceUB1.png[/img]

]http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd33 ... ensUB2.png[/img]

I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior. If you have too and you aren't afraid to say it, copy and paste this into your signature.

User avatar
AirbagDELUXE
Zeppelin (special demand)
Zeppelin (special demand)
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:35 pm
Location: Everywhere!!

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by AirbagDELUXE » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:57 pm

Edward Fox wrote:Technically wouldn't the worst multi-use vehicle be the the Marauder.

The question is not what is the most useless vehicle but which has the fewest uses.

It only has one function, that of a bomber. And, as a bomber it really only works well when capturing sectors, not destroying other units.
Personnality, i disagree with you because Marauder is a good unit against other bombers likes mnozjetz, gargoil 3 and against tanks in multiplayer. He have a good speed so we can make with him a lot of things (capture territory, destroy slow unit, chaff, etc...) It can win a game favor him! :P
A little crazy before everything!! :p

User avatar
Edward Fox
Slime Lord
Slime Lord
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 7:40 pm
Location: Anacortes, Washington

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by Edward Fox » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:33 pm

You use the marauder as chaff?

That would get a bit expensive, no?
]http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd33 ... nceUB1.png[/img]

]http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd33 ... ensUB2.png[/img]

I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal savior. If you have too and you aren't afraid to say it, copy and paste this into your signature.

User avatar
AirbagDELUXE
Zeppelin (special demand)
Zeppelin (special demand)
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:35 pm
Location: Everywhere!!

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by AirbagDELUXE » Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:29 am

A little, but it's effective every time! Mainly against taerkasten's host station!!
Anyway, it's cheap than rhino or dragonfly! :D
A little crazy before everything!! :p

User avatar
superbob1998
Turantul 2 Skorpio (Global Moderator)
Turantul 2 Skorpio (Global Moderator)
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:34 pm
Location: Illinois, United States
Contact:

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by superbob1998 » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:13 am

Hmmm.... You should try sending an army of Dragonflies towards your enemy without the Heli-Patch installed..... I've done it before.... They remain stationary, well, mostly stationary. They do stay in the same spot and spin a bunch, kind of like a Scout that doesn't change its altitude frequently.
Image

://i1221.photobucket.com/albums/dd472/superbob1998/GhorkovBanner.jpg[/img]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
MS Paint skills are off the charts.

User avatar
Hugo350z
Turantul 1 (Veteran)
Turantul 1 (Veteran)
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:48 am

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by Hugo350z » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:21 pm

I gotta say the Firefly. It sucks... The only thing they can do is to annoy your opponent when created in large squads, but it has a really low damage and its maneuverability is really poor, specially when AI controlled. Not to mention that nearly any vehicle could destroy it with a single shot.
Image

BEAM AWAY TURANTUL!!!

User avatar
Syldan
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: Toulouse (france)

Re: worst multi-use vehicle

Post by Syldan » Thu Aug 01, 2013 6:34 pm

All vehicles used by computer don't have the same speed fire ;)

Only 50%. They are restrained.

Post Reply